More ball fields have been approved for the expansion of the Becker Athletic Complex (BAC) as the development of the project continues. As you may know the city had acquired approximately 7 acres of property to the south of the present ball field complex known as the BAC. This property was on the other side of the parking area. The project as originally approved provided for 3 football/soccer fields to be developed with irrigation to provide more green space. In an earlier blog I had discussed in more detail the project as a whole.
In accomplishing the construction of the project a contractor will typically salvage the top soil by stripping it off and saving it for final application before seeding. In planning for this step we had determined there was approximately 12 inches of top soil throughout the site. Once scrapers and dozers were on the site it was found in the areas closest to the trees on the west side that we had roughly twice the thickness of top soil material. With this additional material we had a problem and an opportunity. The problem was we had more top soil than was needed on the project and we had to move it someplace. The opportunity was we had a space that could be utilized for some junior ball fields and using this material in that manner was a constructive option.
With the construction of the project we had taken out two junior ball fields that were established in the 7 acre parcel. We had salvaged the lime material used in the infield for later use. Now we had additional top soil. Having a vacant area that had been considered for junior ball field use in the future collided into the possibilities that perhaps we can make this happen now.
With a small amount of effort and additional funds the junior ball fields could be replaced. We also have the irrigation line running adjacent to the area and so watering of the fields was a possibility. The proposal included the trucking and spreading of the top soil from one area to another. We also looked at a small extension of the irrigation system to provide for a “center” pivot irrigation head that would water both junior ball areas. Seeding would need to be provided as well bringing the total estimated cost at $6,000 for the additional work. These costs will come out of the contingency amount for the project so funding was available. The additional expense was approved.
Looking at the total project, it is anticipated that seeding for all areas will occur in the next few weeks. We’ll get some growth yet this year. Growth will need to continue next season to fully establish the fields into playable turf. With any luck we’ll have suitable conditions for play next fall but in the worse case we’re in business for the spring of 2010.
Friday, August 22, 2008
Tuesday, August 19, 2008
Looking for Great Leaders
Filings for office for City Council open on August 26 and remain open until 5:00 pm on September 9th. There are two council seats and the mayor seat open. These all carry 4 year terms. The filing fee is $2. Applicants must be a resident of the city for the past 30 days and be at least 21 years old upon assuming office.
Application is simple; just fill out a form for candidacy. Upon filing at city hall for candidacy you will be given a good deal of information. The packet includes among other things a Campaign Manual; financial reporting forms; two chapters from the League of Minnesota Handbook discussing council structure and role and Form and Structure of the city; a map; city and MnDOT sign information; and other city specific items.
The State of Minnesota through the Secretary of State will offer a new service on the web providing for an official listing of candidates that have filed for an office. This will be updated daily. Anyone interested in seeing who has filed can get the information online at www.sos.state.mm.us . These listings will be under municipal election searches and by looking for Becker you can look up either Candidate at Large or Mayor filings.
The election is held on November 4th, 2008 from 7:00 am to 8:00 pm. Pre-registration is encouraged however you can also register the day of the election. A valid picture ID is needed which shows a street address to verify residency. You can also bring a neighbor or someone that can vouch that’s a city resident to verify residency. One issue that comes up each year is where do you live? Becker is a community of people that live in a number of different jurisdictions. If you live in Becker Township your polling place is the Town Hall on Hancock Street. As a city resident your polling place is City Hall at 12060 Sherburne Avenue.
Pre-registration can be accomplished in a number of different ways. City and county offices will have registration cards available. If you call the county of residence they will mail out a card to you. When renewing your driver’s license you can also be registered. All mailed registrations must be received by your county of residence by October 14 to be placed on the registration role for voting.
Participating in the election process either as a candidate or a voter is one of the most important freedoms we have. Please exercise that freedom and get out and vote.
Application is simple; just fill out a form for candidacy. Upon filing at city hall for candidacy you will be given a good deal of information. The packet includes among other things a Campaign Manual; financial reporting forms; two chapters from the League of Minnesota Handbook discussing council structure and role and Form and Structure of the city; a map; city and MnDOT sign information; and other city specific items.
The State of Minnesota through the Secretary of State will offer a new service on the web providing for an official listing of candidates that have filed for an office. This will be updated daily. Anyone interested in seeing who has filed can get the information online at www.sos.state.mm.us . These listings will be under municipal election searches and by looking for Becker you can look up either Candidate at Large or Mayor filings.
The election is held on November 4th, 2008 from 7:00 am to 8:00 pm. Pre-registration is encouraged however you can also register the day of the election. A valid picture ID is needed which shows a street address to verify residency. You can also bring a neighbor or someone that can vouch that’s a city resident to verify residency. One issue that comes up each year is where do you live? Becker is a community of people that live in a number of different jurisdictions. If you live in Becker Township your polling place is the Town Hall on Hancock Street. As a city resident your polling place is City Hall at 12060 Sherburne Avenue.
Pre-registration can be accomplished in a number of different ways. City and county offices will have registration cards available. If you call the county of residence they will mail out a card to you. When renewing your driver’s license you can also be registered. All mailed registrations must be received by your county of residence by October 14 to be placed on the registration role for voting.
Participating in the election process either as a candidate or a voter is one of the most important freedoms we have. Please exercise that freedom and get out and vote.
Wednesday, August 6, 2008
Bids or Quotes
Procurement for some goods can be a maze when you look at how cities operate. Some purchases are just out right purchases. These generally involve day to day needs. Other purchases are quotes and some are bids. Sometimes we request proposals from businesses to offer services to us. These are generally for professional services of consultants when used. Knowing what is what can be confusing but knowing what to do is a matter of law.
So what’s a quote and what’s a bid. Sometimes these words get used interchangeably but really there is a difference under law. A quote is a formal amount quoted by a business to provide a certain product. Minnesota law was recently amended to provide for quotes in government purchases for amounts up to $100,000. However any quoted amount over $25,000 needs to have at least 2 quotes so we’re assured we have a competitive quote for the work to be accomplished. Typically we try to get at least two quotes on any purchase of significance.
Under current law quotes can be received for items up to $100,000 but there is one other requirement for quotes over $75,000. This requires the city to receive a performance and payment bond for the purchase. These are separate bonds which provide for security. The performance bond guarantees the “project” gets built or provided in accordance with the specifications or needs of the purchaser. The payment bond provides and assurance to subcontractors that they will be paid. Without that assurance a subcontractor could seek payment from the city even though the city paid the contractor.
A bid is a much more formalized process. Bids are required on all procurements in excess of $100,000. This process involves a public notice to be published in the official newspaper of the city and often in other trade publications. The notice requires bids to be received at a specified time and date. At that time bids are opened publicly and read aloud. Typically the low bidder receives the award. With this process the bidder has to have a bid bond. This bond addresses the issue of signing a contract to do the work at the price bid. If the contractor makes an error and doesn’t want to sign a contract after being awarded the bid he relinquishes the bid bond. These are typically for 5% of the amount of the bid. The thought here is that the city may need to rebid the project and the bid bond addresses the expense of doing this. It also however places the onus on the bidder to do his homework so the process can move smoothly.
There are exceptions to the bidding/quote requirements. Professional services are one of those exceptions. We however periodically do a “Request for Proposals” for some professional service work. We have done this primarily for public works projects in using the services of an engineer. This allows us to evaluate the services being offered and also look at the expense of the engineer for the project. This process takes a bit more time but the ability to select the most qualified or least expensive or other criteria can be accomplished when additional information is received.
It may seem like there are hoops to jump through when dealing with a city but when you look at the reasons for them they becomes easier to understand. There is a method to our madness.
So what’s a quote and what’s a bid. Sometimes these words get used interchangeably but really there is a difference under law. A quote is a formal amount quoted by a business to provide a certain product. Minnesota law was recently amended to provide for quotes in government purchases for amounts up to $100,000. However any quoted amount over $25,000 needs to have at least 2 quotes so we’re assured we have a competitive quote for the work to be accomplished. Typically we try to get at least two quotes on any purchase of significance.
Under current law quotes can be received for items up to $100,000 but there is one other requirement for quotes over $75,000. This requires the city to receive a performance and payment bond for the purchase. These are separate bonds which provide for security. The performance bond guarantees the “project” gets built or provided in accordance with the specifications or needs of the purchaser. The payment bond provides and assurance to subcontractors that they will be paid. Without that assurance a subcontractor could seek payment from the city even though the city paid the contractor.
A bid is a much more formalized process. Bids are required on all procurements in excess of $100,000. This process involves a public notice to be published in the official newspaper of the city and often in other trade publications. The notice requires bids to be received at a specified time and date. At that time bids are opened publicly and read aloud. Typically the low bidder receives the award. With this process the bidder has to have a bid bond. This bond addresses the issue of signing a contract to do the work at the price bid. If the contractor makes an error and doesn’t want to sign a contract after being awarded the bid he relinquishes the bid bond. These are typically for 5% of the amount of the bid. The thought here is that the city may need to rebid the project and the bid bond addresses the expense of doing this. It also however places the onus on the bidder to do his homework so the process can move smoothly.
There are exceptions to the bidding/quote requirements. Professional services are one of those exceptions. We however periodically do a “Request for Proposals” for some professional service work. We have done this primarily for public works projects in using the services of an engineer. This allows us to evaluate the services being offered and also look at the expense of the engineer for the project. This process takes a bit more time but the ability to select the most qualified or least expensive or other criteria can be accomplished when additional information is received.
It may seem like there are hoops to jump through when dealing with a city but when you look at the reasons for them they becomes easier to understand. There is a method to our madness.
Tuesday, July 29, 2008
BAC Expansion
As the Co. Rd. 24 trail project is coming to a close another project is just about to get started. The Becker Athletic Complex (BAC), otherwise know as the ball fields; will see an expansion of an additional green area for youth sports. This area contemplates 3 playing fields but can be used in a number of different ways.
The project contains almost 7 acres of land directly south of the existing parking area which is presently an open field of scrub grass and small trees. These multi-use fields can be used for any outside sport. They can be used for football, soccer, lacrosse, small field softball and tee ball and other activities as needed.
The project included a number of pieces to accomplish and meet other goals of the city. The first part of the project was a directional boring component which brought pipe from the golf course to the ball field area. This was done to get water from the golf course water source and wells to the ball field area. By bringing this water into the area we were able to connect the ball fields irrigation system to this water source. By removing the present connection to the domestic water supply we eliminated some costs as we don’t need to use treated water for irrigation and we reduce the quantity of water used from the domestic system. The benefit of this may be obvious but having increased capacity in the domestic system not only supports household use it also reduces the use of the existing water wells we use for drinking water. This reduction is 200,000 to 400,000 gallons per month in the summer months. This new water source will also serve the new green areas in the BAC. Running the water from the golf course used existing capacity there while saving a new well from being installed at the BAC. Over all this was a cheaper option while providing for some added goals.
Our estimate for this work was $37,500 and the quotes came in far less than that at $20,855.48. The low quote was received was from R.P. Schroeder Construction of Big Lake.
The actual excavation and utility pipe work at the site was a larger project that needed bids to accomplish. The original estimate for the dirt work, storm sewer and sanitary sewer was estimated at $283,625. After some discussion and review of the existing soils the topsoil borrow was reduced by $54,275. Prior to bidding this topsoil was again reduced to project in exchange for a soil amendment of peat to be incorporated into the existing soil at the site. With the estimate of $230,891.10 the city went out for bids.
Bids were received on Monday July 14, 2008 from 13 bidders. Bids ranged from a high of $215,594.35 to the low bid of $139,932.15, with the majority of the bidders in the range of $170,000. The low bidder was RL Larson Excavating from St. Cloud. This bid was almost $27,000 under the next bidder. Having the project come in almost $90,000 under the estimate was amazing.
To finish up this was the final addition of the irrigation equipment for the new fields. The estimate for this was $37,500. This quote came in at $26,680 from Rocky Mountain Construction of Zimmerman. An additional controller will be added to this at $2500 bringing the total to $31,180.
Overall the city was able to reduce the cost from the original estimate by $112,906. Total project costs are at $255,944. It is expected that the project will be installed and seeded by this fall. Grass growth will be needed to occur next year with the possibility of play in the fall of 2009 or spring of 2010. This soft economy does provide for some bargains.
The project contains almost 7 acres of land directly south of the existing parking area which is presently an open field of scrub grass and small trees. These multi-use fields can be used for any outside sport. They can be used for football, soccer, lacrosse, small field softball and tee ball and other activities as needed.
The project included a number of pieces to accomplish and meet other goals of the city. The first part of the project was a directional boring component which brought pipe from the golf course to the ball field area. This was done to get water from the golf course water source and wells to the ball field area. By bringing this water into the area we were able to connect the ball fields irrigation system to this water source. By removing the present connection to the domestic water supply we eliminated some costs as we don’t need to use treated water for irrigation and we reduce the quantity of water used from the domestic system. The benefit of this may be obvious but having increased capacity in the domestic system not only supports household use it also reduces the use of the existing water wells we use for drinking water. This reduction is 200,000 to 400,000 gallons per month in the summer months. This new water source will also serve the new green areas in the BAC. Running the water from the golf course used existing capacity there while saving a new well from being installed at the BAC. Over all this was a cheaper option while providing for some added goals.
Our estimate for this work was $37,500 and the quotes came in far less than that at $20,855.48. The low quote was received was from R.P. Schroeder Construction of Big Lake.
The actual excavation and utility pipe work at the site was a larger project that needed bids to accomplish. The original estimate for the dirt work, storm sewer and sanitary sewer was estimated at $283,625. After some discussion and review of the existing soils the topsoil borrow was reduced by $54,275. Prior to bidding this topsoil was again reduced to project in exchange for a soil amendment of peat to be incorporated into the existing soil at the site. With the estimate of $230,891.10 the city went out for bids.
Bids were received on Monday July 14, 2008 from 13 bidders. Bids ranged from a high of $215,594.35 to the low bid of $139,932.15, with the majority of the bidders in the range of $170,000. The low bidder was RL Larson Excavating from St. Cloud. This bid was almost $27,000 under the next bidder. Having the project come in almost $90,000 under the estimate was amazing.
To finish up this was the final addition of the irrigation equipment for the new fields. The estimate for this was $37,500. This quote came in at $26,680 from Rocky Mountain Construction of Zimmerman. An additional controller will be added to this at $2500 bringing the total to $31,180.
Overall the city was able to reduce the cost from the original estimate by $112,906. Total project costs are at $255,944. It is expected that the project will be installed and seeded by this fall. Grass growth will be needed to occur next year with the possibility of play in the fall of 2009 or spring of 2010. This soft economy does provide for some bargains.
Friday, July 18, 2008
Balancing Act
As the city prepares for the 2009 budget a host of issues consume our thoughts. What will fuel prices be? How much will utilities cost? What increases are expected for health insurance? How much will this or that cost next year?
Also being considered is how can we make our efforts more efficient? What things can go undone? Where can we find some savings in the cost of operations? Can the equipment we have last another year? What will the State of Minnesota do to us this year?
Also thrown into the mix is deferred maintenance. These are things like the street has seen better days, we need to do something about it. Park equipment is wearing out and needs to be replaced. Computer systems that were patched together need to achieve better interoperability and have greater security. The cable broadcast equipment is failing and patchwork replacement is difficult given the change to a digital format. More police officers are needed. Energy conservation retrofits would reduce utility costs but at a price. Different equipment would be more efficient but needs to be purchased.
And so the balancing act begins. There are short term goals and long term needs. There are levy limits for the next 3 years which keeps general levy authority in check. There are numerous “special levies” that occur outside of these limits which may cause the limits, in a general sense, to be exceeded. The point is priorities need to be exercised to do the most with what is available. Looking at all of these factors can make it difficult to weigh the benefits or detriments of various spending decisions but doing so is all part of the budget process.
The budget process takes a number of months to complete. We start in May some years and generally by June with budget worksheets and preliminary numbers. The process continues to be refined in terms of costs, revenues, projects and expenses. By mid September a preliminary levy is established and certified to the county. This amount is the maximum levy the city can exercise. After certification the city continues to look for greater efficiencies and costs that can be cut. The first meeting in December is one where we hold our budget hearing and after comments and final adjustments are made, the final levy is adopted at the second meeting in December.
All in all a great deal of time is expended in each year’s budget. The task requires a good deal of effort and consideration. The end game however is to find that balance of meeting the needs of the city while being good stewards of public funds.
Also being considered is how can we make our efforts more efficient? What things can go undone? Where can we find some savings in the cost of operations? Can the equipment we have last another year? What will the State of Minnesota do to us this year?
Also thrown into the mix is deferred maintenance. These are things like the street has seen better days, we need to do something about it. Park equipment is wearing out and needs to be replaced. Computer systems that were patched together need to achieve better interoperability and have greater security. The cable broadcast equipment is failing and patchwork replacement is difficult given the change to a digital format. More police officers are needed. Energy conservation retrofits would reduce utility costs but at a price. Different equipment would be more efficient but needs to be purchased.
And so the balancing act begins. There are short term goals and long term needs. There are levy limits for the next 3 years which keeps general levy authority in check. There are numerous “special levies” that occur outside of these limits which may cause the limits, in a general sense, to be exceeded. The point is priorities need to be exercised to do the most with what is available. Looking at all of these factors can make it difficult to weigh the benefits or detriments of various spending decisions but doing so is all part of the budget process.
The budget process takes a number of months to complete. We start in May some years and generally by June with budget worksheets and preliminary numbers. The process continues to be refined in terms of costs, revenues, projects and expenses. By mid September a preliminary levy is established and certified to the county. This amount is the maximum levy the city can exercise. After certification the city continues to look for greater efficiencies and costs that can be cut. The first meeting in December is one where we hold our budget hearing and after comments and final adjustments are made, the final levy is adopted at the second meeting in December.
All in all a great deal of time is expended in each year’s budget. The task requires a good deal of effort and consideration. The end game however is to find that balance of meeting the needs of the city while being good stewards of public funds.
Tuesday, July 15, 2008
Safety Along Co. Rd. 24
Ya Know, some things just take time! We’re finally finishing up the Co. Rd. 24 (Central Avenue) trial project. With all good intentions of this being done at least a year ago we’re seeing the end. With the safety of pedestrians in mind as well as a better solution for crossing of Sherburne Avenue we’ve arrived at the end, or almost. There is a small section to accomplish yet on a separate contract.
This project was the result of a “Safe Routes to School” grant program. Our application was one of the few to be funded and was in the mix of the first group to be funded under this program. Having said that, a procedure hadn’t been developed for federal review and funding, state review, and county action. The process was probably more involved than it needed to be. The federal government established the program and funding for it. State was to do the review and make the funds available from federal dollars. As the roadway was a county state aid highway the county had to administrate the construction and pay the vendors. On the way MnDOT was involved in the bidding process along with Sherburne County. The city did the engineering and design. The city and the county had to approve the project. Pay requests needed to be approved by the city, county, and state. The county received the grant funds from the state and makes the payments to the contractor.
This was my first experience with this type of project. Having all these parties acting on a project doesn’t seem to be warranted. Perhaps it is necessary to make sure it meets federal requirements for grants and standards for safety. Perhaps the process hadn’t been defined. After all we were part of the first group to be funded. Perhaps this was seen as an exciting new program and all those who could participate wanted to do so. I’m not sure about the how’s or whys but I do know we have gotten through it and have a proud addition to our pedestrian safety network. Hopefully this saves lives or injury and promotes the health aspects of walking or biking. It will also assist drivers in the school zones in slowing down and stopping for pedestrians. I think it is a win-win for everyone.
We still have a bit more work to do on this project with the separate contract. We have the paperwork to finish. I’m glad the county has to do most of that, Sherburne County was great to work with. I’m sure we’ll have final cleanup and punch list items to address but the users get the last of this. They get the benefit of a successful project.
This project was the result of a “Safe Routes to School” grant program. Our application was one of the few to be funded and was in the mix of the first group to be funded under this program. Having said that, a procedure hadn’t been developed for federal review and funding, state review, and county action. The process was probably more involved than it needed to be. The federal government established the program and funding for it. State was to do the review and make the funds available from federal dollars. As the roadway was a county state aid highway the county had to administrate the construction and pay the vendors. On the way MnDOT was involved in the bidding process along with Sherburne County. The city did the engineering and design. The city and the county had to approve the project. Pay requests needed to be approved by the city, county, and state. The county received the grant funds from the state and makes the payments to the contractor.
This was my first experience with this type of project. Having all these parties acting on a project doesn’t seem to be warranted. Perhaps it is necessary to make sure it meets federal requirements for grants and standards for safety. Perhaps the process hadn’t been defined. After all we were part of the first group to be funded. Perhaps this was seen as an exciting new program and all those who could participate wanted to do so. I’m not sure about the how’s or whys but I do know we have gotten through it and have a proud addition to our pedestrian safety network. Hopefully this saves lives or injury and promotes the health aspects of walking or biking. It will also assist drivers in the school zones in slowing down and stopping for pedestrians. I think it is a win-win for everyone.
We still have a bit more work to do on this project with the separate contract. We have the paperwork to finish. I’m glad the county has to do most of that, Sherburne County was great to work with. I’m sure we’ll have final cleanup and punch list items to address but the users get the last of this. They get the benefit of a successful project.
Thursday, July 3, 2008
Freedom Days
With the passing of Freedom Days in Becker I do want to express my thanks to all those who made the day a success. It is difficult to name each individual or organization that participated as it really has become a community event. The Freedom Days Committee spent a great deal of time shaping the weekend but other organizations also participated in the planning and eventual outcomes for the public to participate and enjoy. Even the eventual participation of the public itself lends to magic of the day. As a community event the community participated and we all joined in the celebration of fun and a successful day! Thank You All for your participation and enjoyment as fun begets fun and it seemed apparent there was plenty of this throughout.
On a more serious note the establishment of Freedom Days is to commemorate the freedoms we have as citizens of the United States. Our ancestors worked diligently to create a model that respects the rights of people to live in a society that recognizes the needs of people. This model is being strived for by many nations throughout the world as the best approach to governance. Celebrating the 4th of July is not only a tradition that celebrates the American Way but also one of family. The anniversary of the declaration of independence is something to celebrate in your own way but take stock in the advantages and meaning that our fore fathers bestowed upon us with their actions. I wish everyone the best over this holiday!
On a more serious note the establishment of Freedom Days is to commemorate the freedoms we have as citizens of the United States. Our ancestors worked diligently to create a model that respects the rights of people to live in a society that recognizes the needs of people. This model is being strived for by many nations throughout the world as the best approach to governance. Celebrating the 4th of July is not only a tradition that celebrates the American Way but also one of family. The anniversary of the declaration of independence is something to celebrate in your own way but take stock in the advantages and meaning that our fore fathers bestowed upon us with their actions. I wish everyone the best over this holiday!
Tuesday, June 17, 2008
A Permanent Solution to Permanent Aid
As I have discussed in the past the State of Minnesota through the Department of Revenue established a new way to value utility property. In doing so the value of the Sherco Power Plant and other utility property declined by 21.8% in the City of Becker. In the last hours of the legislative session the Legislature developed a plan to provide aid to those jurisdictions that lost value and therefore tax revenues as a result. The resulting aid program is described as permanent aid.
The good news is the city will be provided with $553,947 in aid for 2009. For 2010 the aid amount increases to $1,107,894. A little history, the rule change changed the way power plants are valued and was to be phased in over a period of 3 years. This was done with a 20% reduction the first year(2008), 50% the second and 100% the third. This explains the change in aid amounts. This aid was given to cities and townships that lost 4% or more of their value in utility property. The total amount of aid provided for in this amounts to approximately $6 million state wide for 2009 and 2010.
The unfortunate part about the way the law was drafted is the amount of aid decreases as the tax base increases. So any addition in tax base only offsets the amount of state aid paid. If you think about this a little you’ll see that adding commercial or industrial property to our community does nothing to reduce taxes. Adding 100 homes doesn’t help either. This only increases our costs for service with no additional revenue to provide those services. If you are a high growth community such as Becker or Monticello, both affected by this, growth becomes a detriment. Replacing that lost value is slightly more than a Medtronics Campus!
As you can imagine this really doesn’t make sense. Given this was done in the middle of the night, on the last day of the session, it would appear this was one of those unintended consequences of legislators trying to do the right thing for the right reasons. They got us the aid we needed, which is very helpful. We’re breathing a little easier now but the future is still a concern. As I discussed we can add all the tax base we want and only the state benefits with reduced aid payments. As tax base increases so do our expenses in serving these properties. So a permanent solution to the permanent aid needs to occur with the next legislative session.
With this uncertainty in future funding, the city has taken the conservative tact of reducing expenses while banking available resources. In doing so we’ve approached the budget for 2009 in a different way. Each department was given a figure in which to work with for their department that represented a cut in expenditures. Revenues will be lower with interest income and building permits off. The state imposed a 3.9% levy limit for the next three years which also adds to the constraint of finances in Becker.
In any event we have some room in time to get these things accomplished but as they say it’s always something.
The good news is the city will be provided with $553,947 in aid for 2009. For 2010 the aid amount increases to $1,107,894. A little history, the rule change changed the way power plants are valued and was to be phased in over a period of 3 years. This was done with a 20% reduction the first year(2008), 50% the second and 100% the third. This explains the change in aid amounts. This aid was given to cities and townships that lost 4% or more of their value in utility property. The total amount of aid provided for in this amounts to approximately $6 million state wide for 2009 and 2010.
The unfortunate part about the way the law was drafted is the amount of aid decreases as the tax base increases. So any addition in tax base only offsets the amount of state aid paid. If you think about this a little you’ll see that adding commercial or industrial property to our community does nothing to reduce taxes. Adding 100 homes doesn’t help either. This only increases our costs for service with no additional revenue to provide those services. If you are a high growth community such as Becker or Monticello, both affected by this, growth becomes a detriment. Replacing that lost value is slightly more than a Medtronics Campus!
As you can imagine this really doesn’t make sense. Given this was done in the middle of the night, on the last day of the session, it would appear this was one of those unintended consequences of legislators trying to do the right thing for the right reasons. They got us the aid we needed, which is very helpful. We’re breathing a little easier now but the future is still a concern. As I discussed we can add all the tax base we want and only the state benefits with reduced aid payments. As tax base increases so do our expenses in serving these properties. So a permanent solution to the permanent aid needs to occur with the next legislative session.
With this uncertainty in future funding, the city has taken the conservative tact of reducing expenses while banking available resources. In doing so we’ve approached the budget for 2009 in a different way. Each department was given a figure in which to work with for their department that represented a cut in expenditures. Revenues will be lower with interest income and building permits off. The state imposed a 3.9% levy limit for the next three years which also adds to the constraint of finances in Becker.
In any event we have some room in time to get these things accomplished but as they say it’s always something.
Tuesday, June 10, 2008
No Video
The broadcast of our council meeting of June 3rd didn’t go as planned. Somewhere along the line the video part of the board cast was lost and bringing it back wasn’t successful. There was a bit of a scramble dealing with it but to no avail. We were able to provide the audio portion however. This got me to thinking that the equipment was installed when the building addition was done and most of the equipment is 14 years old.
I know I discussed this issue briefly when another component failed not to long ago. Not only is the equipment we use getting to the point of failure but technology has changed drastically since 1994. The video equipment costs we experienced then were about $70,000. Over time we have added to this and replaced some equipment but we’re rapidly getting to the point of looking at the future to determine where we’re going with all of this. Replacing all the equipment at once isn’t in the budget and may not be cost effective. However waiting for everything to die, a piece at a time is also not a prudent approach.
We will hopefully have the situation resolved for the June 17th meeting providing we can replace the component that failed. Our consultant thinks he knows what happened and is trying to get a replacement to install when he comes to check it out. During that meeting we’re also going to have the other discussion about the future and what changes need to be made.
In terms of revenues we have some options that aren’t property tax dollars. When Connections established their franchise for video services we required them to provide some capital financing for equipment needs to operate the local access cable broadcast channel. Some resources still exist from these funds. In addition there is a cable tax that is applied to users’ monthly bills. These funds are paid to the city on an annual basis. These funds have been used to pay for the existing equipment and some routine maintenance and operations expenses but need to be dedicated to replacement.
For now we’re going to hobble along but dealing with this larger issue needs to become a priority. I’m sorry for any inconvenience this may cause and thank you for your patience. If anyone would like a copy of the minutes please give city hall a call and we’ll send out a copy to you.
Thursday, May 22, 2008
Utility Host Community Aid
High on my list of concerns for the city has been the issue of lost property tax values of the Sherco power plant in the city. The State of
The result of revised rule is a devaluation of utility property in Becker by 21.8%. The rule had provided for a phase in of the rule over a period of three years. The city had already seen a 20% reduction (of the 21.8%) for 2008. The next two years we were to see the value drop to 50% and then 100% in 2010. The net tax capacity that was being lost is $3,598,675, the largest loss in the state. Putting that in perspective the loss is in excess of that created by the new Medtronics campus in Mounds View.
Dealing with the resulting loss of taxes has been an ongoing concern for us and one year of cuts have already taken place for 2008. Looking forward we had developed a contingency plan to address the loss however we felt it nearly impossible to assume cost cutting measures that would be deep enough to make up the difference without raising taxes. More than $1 million is needed. This is particularly true when you factor in the amount of debt service we have as a percentage of the budget. Our overall levy is about $5.15 million where 31.6% of that involves debt service where no adjustment can be made.
During the past two legislative sessions the legislature has provided in the tax bill a provision to adjust the tax rate paid by utilities to make up for the change in value. Last year the governor vetoed the bill which included the change. This year it was again included in tax bill and through negotiations of the legislature and the governor in the final hours of the session a compromise was obtained which addresses the issue. The compromise provides the city with State Aid in an amount equal to replace the lost tax revenues formally paid by the utility companies. This aid is considered permanent aid and reduces over time until a threshold is met.
The budget issues as a result of lost value from utility property have been addressed with adequate aid payments from the State of
Friday, May 16, 2008
More Water
Water for the domestic use is and has been a concern for some time now. I’ve written about the failing well and the new well and wellhouse in
Well number 3 is located in the golf course behind the golf maintenance building. The well house there supported both well number 3 and number 5. Well number 5 was the well that failed this past year. Using these two wells at the same time posed some problems as they were too close together. Pumping both of them produced less than each rated capacity so we would alternate their use. Upon further analysis it was noted that well number 3 had a larger pumping capacity than the pump was sized for. This pump was originally sized to pump 350 gallons per minute. When this well was installed the city didn’t need the larger capacity that could be achieved from a larger pump so a smaller more efficient motor was installed.
Up until well number 5 failed it didn’t make sense to upgrade the motor as the interference between the two wells wouldn’t have given us any more water. Now with well number 5 out of the picture, the interference problem isn’t there and the full capacity of the well number 3 can be utilized. Recognizing that the city has been in the process of swapping out the 30 hp motor and installing a 40 hp pump motor in well number 3. This change out will give us significantly more gallons per minute. We’re hoping to get 600 gpm but it may be 550 gpm.
In making this change over a good deal of existing equipment is being used in the well house. The piping for the larger well number 5 is being used now for the upgraded well number 3. The VFD (variable frequency drive) controller from well number 5 is being reused to better control the system with slower startups of the pump and use to match the needs for water demand. This not only saves energy but it also reduces wear on the pump motor extending its life. All the disinfection equipment continues to be used as well.
Making these changes is accomplishing more with the resources we have. With these upgrades we benefit with the potential for 60 to 70% increase in the production of the well with limited additional costs. This additional capacity in production doesn’t quite get us to the point of what was lost with the well number 5 failure but it does get us close. With well number 6 coming on board we should be ahead of the game for the summer season.
Monday, May 5, 2008
A Safety Culture
I was struck with the celebration that occurred at LPI this past week as it isn’t often that an organization takes the task of safety to the heights they have. They have achieved almost a million man hours with no lost time due to an injury. That’s not on the heals of luck but rather on a continued hard focused effort to have and maintain an safe environment. They have enrolled in the state sponsored Volunteer Prevention Program which is type of partnership with the state and OSHA to self direct their safety program. They have a very active safety committee which directs their safety effort. These actions have netted them the Mn Star Worksite designation.
As Mike Fiterman, CEO of Liberty Diversified Industries, the parent company to LPI stated they have an obligation to each employee to operate a safe environment. Each employee needs to return home at the end of the day with all the parts he came to work with. The celebration was one of honoring each employee for their commitments towards a safe environment. The celebration included representatives from Minnesota Department Labor and Industry. Commissioner Steve Swiggin congratulated them stating that LPI has a better safety record than 87% of all industries in
I believe we all have something to learn from these efforts. Being safe is something we can get excited about. Having a safe employment situation is possible with hard work and dedicated effort. The lack of lost work days due to injury at the job is worth celebrating and TRULY is a worthy goal. Accomplishing that goal requires a work ethic to operate in a safe manner and as such LPI has been successful in accomplishing that culture. Congratulations to the employees at LPI for your success!
Wednesday, April 23, 2008
Extenting Utilities
With a reconstruction of a roadway the city has an opportunity to install utilities of water and sewer while the roadway is dug up. This saves the costs of rebuilding the road at a future time, if utilities were installed later. Doing so is important not only from the standpoint of costs savings but also in the context of this area being our growth corridor. Making the installation of utilities at this time gets us ahead of the curve providing a proactive approach.
In working through this the county has been great to deal with. We have good cooperation and through our joint efforts will see a project that works for both parties. The process includes the county setting grades and designing the roadway and drainage. The city designs the water and sewer installation and makes that information available to the county for a joint bid, which will probably take place in February of 2009. The city provides for inspection of the pipe work and the county provides for inspection of the roadwork. We pay our costs associated with the contract to the county who administrates the contract.
In addition to the pipe work the city will also be looking at an additional well and well house to be located towards the north end of the project. Installing another well should get the city positioned ahead of the needs of the residents and their demands for water. This will reduce our heavy dependence on just a couple of wells. Addressing the water issue should give us breathing room to meet present and future needs.
Looking at all this from a financial perspective is where we start to grown a bit. Having the utilities installed in our growth corridor gets us ahead of the game but the needs for growth have certainly cooled in the last couple of years. The city is fortunate that we have adequate resources to accomplish these tasks due to planning and anticipating these needs. Opportunities now exist to work together and accomplish the right thing, a joint project. However it may not seem apparent to accomplish them at this time as the times of change are moving slowly.
In looking at this two things come to mind. With the timing of the roadway project we would be considered foolish to not take advantage of the opportunity to install utilities. The well as an additional water supply is also hugely important to the residents of the city. Yes, doing all of this is costly but planning for our future from an infrastructure and fiscal standpoint addresses the responsibility of managing the affairs of the city and continues services to our residents.
Wednesday, April 16, 2008
Hope for Another Time
A good number of years ago the city and NSP had started discussions about the possibility of a trail through NSP’s buffer property south of Sherco and north of the
With funding in hand we had high hopes to be able to accomplish the project providing for a trail in almost untouched property owned by Xcel to be available to hikers and bikers. The trail consisted of 2 parking areas and with both paved and dirt trails. This all provided an opportunity for all types of users to enjoy nature and the vistas available on the trail that was to be created. We had, along the way, also assembled a number of supportive groups. Habitat restoration was worked on as well as the elimination of invasive plant species. The National Park Service was also helpful in coordinating efforts along the way.
The final step before construction was the need to negotiate an easement that was acceptable the city, county, the State of
It is with great sadness I state that the parties could not agree on a solution that was workable and the project has now been declared off the table and essentially dead. The state has withdrawn the funds from this project to be applied to another worthily cause.
Working through these issues was a good deal of talented people who all need recognition but three stand out in my mind. These include Dave Heberling of NSP who started with the idea. Kelli Neu, of my staff, worked diligently on the project with countless meetings and activity. She really took the lion’s share of the project under her wing. Finally, Randy Thoreson, from the National Park Service, who was able to leverage interested parties as well as enthusiasm in making the final push a reality towards funding. In the end we had many, many people who participated, perhaps numbering in the mid 20’s, all interested in the project. All of them deserve credit for the contributions.
Perhaps at another time this could be raised again as I believe those that contributed had a great deal of hope for what was to come. I also feel that this hope continues.
Friday, March 28, 2008
Going "Green" at Pebble Creek
With the golf season quickly approaching us the city has been active in getting our house in order for play at Pebble Creek. One area of change will be that of golf cars. Pebble Creek has had Club Car cars since it started operations in 1988. Our fleet started with gas engines. We have since phased in a complete change to electric carts. This was seen as a great move to a quieter and more energy efficient solution for the future.
We have now moved into another change in golf cars for Pebble Creek. With the conversion of the fleet many golfers were impatient with the phase out. Everyone wanted the electric cars and with several years of change we got to the point where the last two years of phase out occurred in one year. This meant we acquired approximately 30 carts rather than 15. With a rotation that provided for 15 carts to be replaced annually we sort of hit the wall with increased maintenance costs needed to replace batteries in approximately 15 carts. This is a rather large expense with limited value given the age of the cars. So options were pursued to obtain the best value for Pebble Creek.
The leasing of carts seemed to be the best option and to maximize the benefit to the golfing public a new fleet of cars was considered. After consideration and getting quotes from two makers of golf cars a decision was made to replace the fleet with 84 new EZ Go cars. In doing this all the existing cars would be traded in which brings our lease cost down.
The terms of the lease are for 5 years at a cost of $28,224 per year. This compares to an annual cost of roughly $50,000 given the past purchase option we had used. Part of the difference is we’re trading equity in the existing cars for a reduced lease payment. In thinking about this and looking at the end of the lease if the city wishes to acquire the cars we have an obligation of $1250 per car. If we choose not to acquire the cars we can look at another lease however the annual cost will be much higher than this initial lease. Keeping the differences in mind it is the intention to budget and reserve capital dollars over the lease term so that funds would be available to either acquire the cars or enter into a new lease with available funds to lower the annual cost.
The EZ Go cars will not only be a change for the golf course they are a radical change in the industry for golf carts. These carts are manufactured with mostly recycled materials. They have 350 less moving parts than previous models. They carry a 4 year bumper to bumper warranty which should dramatically reduce our maintenance costs. The motor is an AC electric motor which takes less current to run and the battery system is 30% more efficient. More total uses per battery are also part of the enhancements. The motor locks when not in use eliminating the need for a brake or for the golfer to set one. Maintenance costs are further reduced with a closed battery fill system allowing for quick service.
Looking at the end product the units will include windshields and roofs. Added features will include a rain cover for clubs and a different look. It’s a great change for the future and with a more environmentally friendly design. Please take the time to enjoy Pebble Creek while also enjoying our new golf cars.
Monday, March 10, 2008
Utility Tax Breaks
The legislative session is in full action with bills being heard and debated. As I have written in the past, the city continues to look at the utility rule change regarding valuation and the impact it has had on the city. A tax bill which included a change to the class rates for utilities was proposed. Previously we had looked at a change from 2.0% to 3.0% to bring utility property to a neutral tax considering the before and after rule change outcomes. The first year of the phase in for the rule change took effect for 2008 so all cities with utility property saw some degree of impact as a result. Almost every taxing jurisdiction has utility property of some sort. Think about pipelines, transmission lines, and substations, it doesn’t have to be a power plant. However cities with power plants see the largest impacts.
With the impact of the first year behind us the bill was amended to reflect a utility rate of 2.8%. This is a reduction of 0.2% in the rate and a tax cut for utilities. A “non-controversial” tax bill was proposed dealing with the work that was completed last year but vetoed by the governor. During the process however utilities were opposed to class rate changes and the Commissioner of Revenue warned of a possible veto by the governor if this provision continued to be included in the bill. The House passed the bill as drafted but in moving to the Senate the bill was stripped of the class rate changes for utilities. It passed in the Senate and returned to the House to be passed as amended. This bill was forwarded to the Governor for his signature.
The Governor has given his supplemental budget which provides for Transition Aid for two years for host utility cities. This only postpones the outcome for a couple of years. What the city and other host communities of power plants want however is a permanent fix to the problem. This problem was created by the state yet they want the host communities to finance the fix, another unfunded mandate. By this I mean all the tax payers who reside in host power plant jurisdictions would see a shift from utility to other tax payers.
There seems to be a commitment to find that permanent fix with a class rate change for utility property but if it happens it will be in the final tax bill that balances the states budget. A lot can happen when the state is looking at a $935 million shortfall and a governor who doesn’t want to raise taxes. What seems to be missing in all of this is the class rate change doesn’t increase taxes for the utilities; it only adjusts for the reduction in value the state imposed. Without a class rate change, taxes will increase for businesses and residents as a result of shifting burdens away from the utility taxpayer.
Utilities, state wide, since 2001 have seen tax concessions of approximately $48 million. When the rule change is fully implemented in 2010 they would receive an additional $34 million in tax breaks. Should the state continue to support tax breaks for utilities? What do you think?
Please let your Senator and Representative know what your thoughts are on this issue. Senator Wergin’s email is sen.betsy.wergin@senate.mn and Representative Olson’s email is rep.mark.olson@house.mn.
Thursday, March 6, 2008
Water Progress
Spring isn’t here yet but not far away, summer will sneak up on us before we know it and that means watering season. Wow do we use water in the summer months! It seems everyone enjoys green grass in the summer and with the soils we have here in Becker, black sugar sand, it takes a good deal of sprinkling to keep the grass in top condition. So we use water in mass quantities much to the chagrin of the Mn DNR, but that’s another story.
Last year I wrote about the loss of one of our municipal wells and our efforts to replace that well. We searched all over the town looking for a good supply and finally found an area that should produce adequate quantities of water. During the winter we developed plans and specifications for a well and well house to provide for a new water source. Once they were approved, advertisements for bids were made with bids received on March 4th.
Given the early season for bids we had a lot of interest in the work. There were 7 bids on the well house and 6 bids on the well. Both of these bids were very competitive in nature and I feel the city saw good value in the bid amounts.
The well house had a low bid of $352,697.00 from Preusser Construction of St. Cloud. They have built a number of well houses in other communities. The second bid for the well house was within 1% of the low bidder’s amount. We had originally talked about an estimate of $300,000 for a well house but increased the size to accommodate three well runs and also improved the architectural look somewhat as this will be located in
With the well estimate we had 6 bids but one had to be eliminated. That bid had failed to acknowledge an addendum which expanded the work to be included in the bid. The lowest acceptable bidder was LTP Enterprises, Inc from
One snag in the project is that of a Department of Heath permit. We have applied for it and the review has taken place. It appears we have met the requirements for paperwork and the related DNR water conservation plan but no permit has been issued. We believe it to be a matter of a few days for issuance and in the meantime the contracts and contractors bonds and insurance requirements are being prepared. Generally this process can take up to 10 days so hopefully there won’t be a delay on the project. Once the permit and contract issues have been resolved the contractors can start their work, weather permitting. We hope to have the well on line for the summer watering season but will continue to work on water resources as we have a thirsty demand for water in Becker.
Tuesday, February 26, 2008
North American Marsupial
The other day I came home and was in the garage when my neighbor comes over to ask about a curious animal he had seen under his bird feeder. After talking about it we thought he had seen an Opossum. Generally I think most of us think these to be a southern creature not venturing this far north but over the past decade the opossum has moved into
Sure enough after getting a flashlight and looking under the nearby structure he had a full grown opossum. These are large cat sized creatures with pointy pink nose, grey or black fur with pink feet and a naked pink tail. These are solitary nocturnal animals. They generally move very slowly and when frightened could hiss or growl but generally become unable to flee and fall into a state of involuntary movement laying down and “playing possum”.
Although we’re not accustomed to these animals they are rather unique. They are
Checking the next day the opossum had moved on to where ever it had been living but it got me to thinking. Perhaps I had been too quick to blame the squirrels with the bird feeder being empty in my backyard. I won’t be filling it soon. I don’t believe you have much to fear about opossums as they are very placid animals but I’d like him or her to move on. I don’t want my vegetable garden to get raided this summer.
Thursday, February 21, 2008
Fast Thinking
Perhaps you have had one of those days when things just don’t go they way they should. I think we all have and sometimes, it seems nothings seems to go right. Well we had one of those moments in fire drill fashion just before the council meeting on February 19th. Just before we’re about to broadcast the meeting we go to turn on the DVD recorder and it’s dead. No lights, no power, nothing. The meeting is about to start and the means for recording isn’t available.
No problem, in the past as we had two VCR’s that did the job. If one went down the other would be used. Our back up now is the VCR and having not used it for several years it wasn’t automatic to switch it over. Fast thinking was in play however to save the day. We had another VCR in the building set up so it could record the broadcast as it was accomplished live. The fast thinking was great but not fast enough to catch the start of the meeting and we didn’t capture the first 3 minutes or so.
In retrospect the equipment we have been using is coming to the point where reliability is an issue. The DVD recorders weren’t that old but had seen a number of year’s worth of service. Our backup is original equipment now about 12 years old. An investment in not one both two DVD recorders seems to be in order. And unfortunately with the VCR recording of the meeting the quality of the recording isn’t what we have had in the recent past.
Given most of the equipment is 12 years old and was never of TV studio quality it probably is time we look at some upgrades. I guess it takes a “now what do we do” moment to get back on track. Thanks to Greg Pruszinske for saving the meeting recording.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
